Volume 3, Issue 5, October 2014, Page: 187-195
Audit Firm Characteristics and Audit Quality in Nigeria
Ilaboya Ofuan James, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
Ohiokha Friday Izien, Department of Accounting, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, Edo State, Nigeria
Received: Oct. 22, 2014;       Accepted: Oct. 29, 2014;       Published: Oct. 30, 2014
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijber.20140305.14      View  3634      Downloads  459
This study examines the impact of audit firms’ characteristics on audit quality. We proxy the dependent variable (audit quality) using the usual dichotomous variable of 1 if big 4 audit firm and 0 if otherwise. Data for the study were sourced from the financial statements of 18 food and beverage companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange market within the period studied (2007-2012). The multivariate regression technique with emphasis on Logit and Probit method was used to estimate our model for the study. The choice of this approach was basically influenced by the dichotomous nature of our dependent variable and the fact that our data is both time series and cross-sectional. The findings indicate that there is a positive relationship between firm size, board independence and audit quality whereas there is a negative relationship between auditor’s independence, audit firm size, audit tenure and audit quality. The study suggests the need for the Nigerian Financial Reporting Council and other regulatory bodies in line with best practices to look critically into the three years professional requirements for auditors.
Audit Quality, Audit Tenure, Audit Independence, Board Independence
To cite this article
Ilaboya Ofuan James, Ohiokha Friday Izien, Audit Firm Characteristics and Audit Quality in Nigeria, International Journal of Business and Economics Research. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2014, pp. 187-195. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20140305.14
Abedalgader, A., Ibrahim, T. R., & Baker, R. A. (2010). Do audit tenure and firm size contribute to audit quality? Journal of Managerial Auditing, 26(3), 317 – 334.
Adeniyi, S. I. &Mieseigha, L. G. (2003). Audit tenure: An assessment of its effects on audit quality in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science, 3(3), 275 – 283.
Arens, A. A. &Loebbecke, J. K. (1997).Auditing: An integrated approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Arrunada, B. & Paz-Ares, C. (1998). Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination.International Review of Law and Economics, 17(1), 31 – 61.
Arrumade, B. (2000). Audit quality: attributes, private safeguards and the role of regulation. The European Accounting Review, 9(2), 205 – 225.
Bae, G. S. & Lee, J. E. (2003). Does audit firm size matter? The effect of audit firm size measured by audit firm revenue, number of offices and professional headcounts on audit quality and audit fees.Journal of Accounting Research, 50(20), 10 – 17.
Balsam, S., Krishran, J. & Yang, S. J. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality.Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(3), 71 – 97.
Barbadillo, E. & Aguilar, N. (2008). Does auditor tenure improve audit quality? Mandatory auditors rotation versus long term auditing. An empirical analysis.Working Paper, University of Cadizi Spain.
Beattice, V. &Fearnley, S. (1995). The importance of audit firm characteristics and the drivers of auditor change in UK listed companies, Accounting and Business Research, 25(2), 227 – 239.
Bolanle, A. B., Olanrewaju, A. S., &Muyideen, A. A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and profitability of Nigeria’s banks: A casual relationship. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(1), 6 – 17.
Carcello, J. V. &Palmrose, Z. (1994).Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients, Journal of Accounting Research,32(Supplement)1 – 30.
Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004).Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 55-69.
Copley, P. &Doncent, M. (1993). Auditor tenure fixed fee contracts and the supply of substandard single audits, Public Budgeting and Finance, 13, 23 – 35.
Davis, L. R., Soo, B., &Trompeter, G. (2003).Audit tenure, auditor’s independence and earnings management, Working Paper, Boston College.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, (1981)183 – 199.
Dezoort, F. T., &Salterio, S. E. (2001). The effect of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee membersjudgements; Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(2), 31 – 47.
Dopuch, N. D., King, R. R., & Schwartz, R. (2001).An experimental investigation of reputation and rotation requirements. Journal of Accounting Research, 39 (1), 93 – 117.
Ebrahim, A. (2001). Auditing quality, auditor tenure, client importance and earnings management: An additional evidence. Working Papers, Rutgers University.
Enofe, D.O.; Mgbame, C.O&EnabosiO.C. (2013).Corporate Governance and Audit Quality in Nigeria. ESUT Journal of Accountancy, 4(1), 138-145
Francis, J. R. &Krishman, J. (1999).Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism.Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135 – 166.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345 – 368.
FRC (2006b). Promoting audit quality, Discussion Paper, London: Financial Reporting Council.
FRC (2008). The audit quality framework: London: Financial Reporting Council.
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
Geiger, M. A., &Raghumandari, K. (2002).Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures.Auditing, 21, (2) 67 – 78.
Ghosh, A. & Moon, D. (2003).Auditor tenure and perceptions of auditor quality.The Accounting Review, 80(2), 585 – 612.
IAASB (2011). Audit quality: An IAASB perspective, International Auditing and Assurance Standards, Board, New York.
Imhoff, E. A. (1988). The effects of ex-arile earnings uncertainty as earnings response coefficient.The Accounting Review, 67(2), 427 – 439.
Jackson, A. B., Moldrich, M., & Roebuck, J. K. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19 (4), 637 – 660.
Jenkis, D. S., Kane, G. D., &Velury, U. (2006).Earnings quality decline and the effect of industry specialist auditors, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 71 – 90.
Johnson, V., Khorana, I. K., & Reynolds, J. K. (2002).Audit firm tenure and the quality of financial reports, Contemporary Accounting Research, 19, 637 – 660.
Lee, C. J., Liu, C. & Wang, T. (1999).The 150-hour rule.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(2), 203 – 228.
Mitra, S. &Hossdin, M. (2010). Auditor’s industry specialists and earnings management of firm reporting internal control weaknesses under SOX section 404. Working Paper, Wayne State University and Fogelman College.
Mock, T. J. & Smith, D. (1982). A multi-attribute model for audit evaluation.In Proceedings of the V.I. University of Kanas Audit Symposium.
Moizer, P. (1998). Company director’s view on the performance of the 1987 Big Eight and the 1996 Big Six, Leeds University Business School Working Paper.
Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, C. T. (2003).Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation.The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779 – 799.
Nashnea, G. (2004). Auditor’s Rotation and the quality of audits. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 22 – 26.
Nelson, M., Elliott, J., &Turpley, R. (2002). Evidence fro auditors about manager’s and auditor’s earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77 (Supplement), 175 – 202.
Reynolds, J. K. & Francis, J. R. (2000). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 375 – 400.
Schroeder, M. S., Solomon, I. & Vickery, D. W. (1986). Audit quality: The perceptions of audit committee chairperson and audit partners, auditing: A journal of Practice and Theory, 5(1), 86 – 94.
Simunic, D. & Stein, M. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence, Auditing: Journal of Practice and Theory, 15 (supplement), 119 – 134.
Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research (Spring), 161 – 190.
Solomon, I., Shields, M., Whittington, O. R. (1999). What do industry-specialist auditors know? Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 191 – 208.
Summer, M. (1998). Does mandatory rotation enhance auditor independence? European Accounting Review, 9(2), 205 – 224.
Teoh, S. H., & Wong, T. J. (1993).Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient.The Accounting Review, 68, 346 – 366.
Titman, S. &Trueman, B. (1986).Information quality and the valuation of new issues.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8 (2), 159 – 172.
Vanstraelen, A. (2000). Impact of renewable long-term audit mandates on audit quality, European Accounting Review, 9(3), 419-442.
Watts, R. &Zimmeranson, J. (1983). Agency problems, auditing and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law and Economic, 26(3), 613 – 633.
Windor, C. & Warning-Rasmussen, B. (2009). The rise of regulatory capitalism and the decline of auditor independence: A critical and experimental examination of auditor’s conflicts of interests. Critical Perception of Accounting, 20(2), 267 – 288.
Yamane,T.(1967).Elementory sampling theory. Retrieved from www.Jstor.org/stable/2284149
Browse journals by subject