Volume 7, Issue 6, December 2018, Page: 218-226
Research on the Phenomenon That the Increase of Grain Production Did Not Cause the Harvest Paradox in China from 2003 to 2014
Xu Jianlong, College of Economics, Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining, China
Zhang Xinyue, College of Economics, Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining, China
Received: Nov. 8, 2018;       Accepted: Nov. 30, 2018;       Published: Dec. 20, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180706.16      View  110      Downloads  51
Abstract
The phenomenon that China's increase of grain production didn’t cause the Harvest Paradox from 2003 to 2014 occurred in the context of significant increase in domestic residents’ income and food demand, as well as loosening price and the market of grain purchase and sales. Research on the phenomenon not only enhances the understanding of the condition and mechanism for the Harvest Paradox, but also maybe offers some little reference values in solving food problems of China. Following the methods of Samuelson and Nordhaus, this paper utilizes the supply and demand theorem to study the phenomenon. The phenomenon was found it didn’t cause the loss of farmers' total income that the grain production in China had increased for 11 years from 2003 to 2014, which was inconsistent with the Harvest Paradox in economics. It resulted from non-grain price factors which caused the demand line moved in excess of the supply line. Thus the grain price rose. Grain supply policies taken by Chinese government such as the four subsidies were conducive to the Harvest Paradox. To ensure that farmers’ income increase, the demand line should get sharper move towards the upper right via the power of market or government policies.
Keywords
Chinese Grain Production, Demand Line’s Movement, Occurrence Condition of Harvest Paradox, Supply and Demand Theorem
To cite this article
Xu Jianlong, Zhang Xinyue, Research on the Phenomenon That the Increase of Grain Production Did Not Cause the Harvest Paradox in China from 2003 to 2014, International Journal of Business and Economics Research. Vol. 7, No. 6, 2018, pp. 218-226. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180706.16
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Cheng Guoqiang. China's agricultural subsidy system design and policy choice [M]. Beijing: China Development Press, 2011: 36-51.
[2]
Chen Xiwen et al. 60 years of rural institutional changes in China [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2009: 161.
[3]
He Wei. Current Situation, Problems and Perfect Countermeasures of China's Minimum Grain Purchase Price Policy [J]. Macroeconomic Research, 2010 (10): 32-36, 43.
[4]
Zhu Mande. Comparison of the Function and Effect of Agricultural Product Price Support and Direct Subsidy Policy——An Empirical Review [J]. Journal of Guizhou University (Social Science Edition), 2014 (2): 29-34.
[5]
Zhan Lin, Jiang Heping. The Deadlock and Breakthrough of Promoting the Grain Target Price System Reform in china [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2015 (2): 14-20.
[6]
Lu Wencong et al. Regional Equilibrium of Chinese Grain Supply and Demand under Globalization: Implications for National Grain Security [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2011 (4): 16-28.
[7]
Liao Xiyuan, Li Fengbo, Xu Chunchun, Shen Hongfang, Fang Fuping. National Strategy for Grain Security [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2011 (4): 9-15.
[8]
Hu Feng. Does the Government Raise the Minimum Purchase Price to Drive Up Grain Prices? [J]. China Grain Economy, 2011 (3): 32-33.
[9]
Paul Samuelson, William Nordhaus: Microeconomics [M]. Beijing: People's Posts and Telecommunications Press in China, Chinese translation, 2012: 67.
[10]
Lu Feng, Xie Ya. The Supply of an the Demand for Grains in China, and the Trend of Prices (1998-2007) [J]. Management World, 2008 (3): 70-80.
[11]
Gregory Mankun. Principles of Economics (Microeconomics Volume) [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, Chinese translation, 2012: 109.
[12]
Zhao Shoujun, Wang Zhiqiang, Zhang Zhanyong, Li Fulin. 2011. The Understanding of " cheap of cereal Injury Farmers" from the Perspective of Public Management——Taking the Unsalable Potato in Inner Mongolia as an Example [J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, 2011 (6): 73-77.
[13]
Jiang Xusheng. To Analyse and Countermeasure on "Cheap Grain Hurts the Farmers"[J]. Value Engineering, 2009 (11): 27-29.
[14]
Giovanni Federico. Feeding the World - History of Agricultural Economics (1800-2000) [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, Chinese translation, 2011: 20-21.
[15]
Jeffrey M. Perloff. Intermediate Microeconomics (Sixth Edition) [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, Chinese translation, 2014: 33.
[16]
Zhou Jian. Discussion on the Solution of "Gu Yu and Injuring Farmers" from the Perspective of Demand Elasticity [J]. Agriculture Outlook, 2007 (12): 3-5.
[17]
Sun Xiaosu. Countermeasures to Inexpensive Paddy Damaging Peasants and Difficultly Increasing Peasant’s Income [J]. Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College, 2006 (4): 106-108.
[18]
Paul Samuelson, William Nordhaus: Microeconomics [M]. Beijing: People's Posts and Telecommunications Press in China, Chinese translation, 2012: 66.
[19]
Gregory Mankun. Principles of Economics (Microeconomics Volume) [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, Chinese translation, 2012: 107.
Browse journals by subject